The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6783•Gary Lee Smith v. Officer J. Aita; Salisbury City
17-6783Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6783
GARY LEE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER J. AITA; SALISBURY CITY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SALISBURY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC J. SANDER, #1122; PFC J.
DIMARE; PFC J. BURT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (8:14-cv-03487-CCB)
Submitted: January 31, 2018 Decided: February 14, 2018
Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Gary Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ernest I. Cornbrooks IV, KARPINSKI, COLARESI
& KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Gary Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing in part his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Smith v. Aita, No. 8:14-cv-03487-CCB (D. Md. July 12, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.