The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7084•Marshall Dewayne Williams v. Warden
17-7084Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7084
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:16-cv-00548-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 28, 2017
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marshall DeWayne Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marshall DeWayne Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
granting Respondent’s summary judgment motion on Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition, and denying Williams’ summary judgment motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Williams’ application to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Williams v. Warden, No. 7:16-cv-00548-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. July 5, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.