The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7118•United States of America v. John Paul Smith
17-7118Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 22, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7118
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN PAUL SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00064-GMG-7)
Submitted: January 10, 2018 Decided: January 22, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Paul Smith appeals the district court’s order granting him a sentence
reduction pursuant to his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion based on Amendment
782. On appeal, Smith argues the district court erred in not appointing him counsel and
conducting a hearing based on Amendment 657, and in its finding of actual oxycodone
for which he was accountable. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Smith, No. 3:02-cr-00064-GMG-7 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.