The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7156•United States of America v. Phillip Jerome Murphy
17-7156Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP JEROME MURPHY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00103-RAJ-DEM-1)
Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Jerome Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty, William David Muhr,
Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Norfolk, Virginia; Kevin Patrick Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Jerome Murphy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
dismiss the indictment and void a criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Murphy, No. 2:15-cr-00103-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. July 17,
2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.