The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7216•JAMES EDWARD MCLEAN, JR., a/k/a James E. McLean, Jr. v. Warden Fci Estill
17-7216Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 12, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7216
JAMES EDWARD MCLEAN, JR., a/k/a James E. McLean, Jr.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI ESTILL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (9:16-cv-02956-MGL)
Submitted: January 25, 2018 Decided: February 12, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United
States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Edward McLean, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLean v. Warden, No.
9:16-cv-02956-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.