The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7250•Alexander Jiggetts v. Baltimore County
17-7250Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 12, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7250
ALEXANDER JIGGETTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT;
DETECTIVE STEVEN INGE, In his Official and Individual Capacity;
DETECTIVE GENE STEVEN PRYOR, In his Official and Individual Capacity;
OFFICER RICHARD GARLAND, In his Official and Individual Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01526-JFM)
Submitted: January 5, 2018 Decided: January 12, 2018
Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Jiggetts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Jiggetts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jiggetts v. Balt.
Cty., No. 1:17-cv-01526-JFM (D. Md. June 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.