The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7321•Donald Brown v. Warden Fci Williamsburg
17-7321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7321
DONALD BROWN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01412-RMG)
Submitted: February 20, 2018 Decided: February 23, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Respondent
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Warden FCI Williamsburg,
No. 4:17-cv-01412-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.