The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7344•United States of America v. Willie Lamark Waters, a/k/a Boom Boom, a/k/a Bang ’em up, a/k/a Mark
17-7344Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7344
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIE LAMARK WATERS, a/k/a Boom Boom, a/k/a Bang ’em up, a/k/a Mark,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:07-cr-00022-AWA-FBS-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Lamark Waters, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Alan Mark Salsbury,
Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lamark Waters appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 to
the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Waters,
No. 2:07-cr-00022-AWA-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 22, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.