The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7355•Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge
17-7355Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7355
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE; MARK HORNAK; DAVID HICTON; ROBERT
CESSAR; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; JEFFERSON B.
SESSIONS III,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02219-D)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order adopting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as
well as its order denying Banks’ self-styled motion to vacate that order and judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. See Banks v. Ratledge, No. 5:16-hc-02219-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14,
2017 & Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.