Sundari K. Prasad, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter

17-7376Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2018

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7376
SUNDARI K. PRASAD, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00897-MHL-RCY)
Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous
Prasad’s civil rights action against Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc., because the claims
raised therein were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.* On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Prasad does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in her informal
brief. Thus, Prasad has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v.
Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court dismissed this action after conducting frivolity review pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.