United States of America v. Michael Cromwell, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7389
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* United States v.
Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Because Cromwell does not challenge on appeal the district court’s disposition of
his claim based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, he has forfeited appellate
review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

-- 2 of 2 --