The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7392•Percy J. Tucker, a/k/a Percy James Tucker v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
17-7392Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 16, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7392
PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS,
Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN
ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ
LINDSLEY, Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 17-7393
PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS,
Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN
ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ
LINDSLEY, Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina,
at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03307-D)
Submitted: October 2, 2018 Decided: October 16, 2018
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percy James Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Percy J. Tucker appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil complaint, and denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Tucker v. Lynch, No. 5:15-ct-03307-D (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 22, 2018; Oct. 4, 2017; Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.