The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7435•Audrel Jack Watson, Jr. v. Warden Wright
17-7435Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7435
AUDREL JACK WATSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN WRIGHT; R. E. CLARKE; MR. GRAVES; MS. JONES; UNKNOWN
VA DOC OMBUDSMAN; UNKNOWN GEO/LVCC INDIVIDUALS;
UNKNOWN VA DOC INDIVIDUALS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
HAROLD CLARKE; UNKNOWN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF GEO,
Defendants
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01214-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon Matheson, THOMPSON
MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v.
Wright, No. 1:15-cv-01214-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.