The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7660•Josand Farmer v. GIO RAMIREZ, Warden
17-7660Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 20, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7660
JOSAND FARMER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
GIO RAMIREZ, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (0:17-cv-02614-TMC)
Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2018
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Josand Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Josand Farmer, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Farmer v. Ramirez, No. 0:17-cv-02614-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 2017).
We deny Farmer’s motion to expedite decision and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.