The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7664•Thomas William Browning v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst - Estill
17-7664Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7664
THOMAS WILLIAM BROWNING,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst - Estill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:16-cv-03237-RMG)
Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas William Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II , Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas William Browning appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See
Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.