The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1086•Marva Lashalle Austin v. Government Employee Insurance Company (geico)
18-1086Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1086
MARVA LASHALLE AUSTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00744-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: August 14, 2018 Decided: September 4, 2018
Before KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marva L. Austin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marva L. Austin appeals the district court’s order denying in part for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction her motion for clarification regarding the court’s attorney
appointment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Gov’t Emp. Ins. Co.
(GEICO), No. 2:16-cv-00744-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2017). We grant Austin’s
motion to seal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.