The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1298•In re: Starsha M. Sewell
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1298
In re: STARSHA M. SEWELL,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00114)
Submitted: June 12, 2018 Decided: July 26, 2018
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order imposing a prefiling injunction
after considering Sewell’s response to a show cause order. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. In re Sewell, No. 1:18-mc-00114 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.