The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1320•Cecelia D. Walton v. North Carolina Department of Commerce
18-1320Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 30, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1320
CECELIA D. WALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00054-MR-DLH)
Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 30, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cecelia D. Walton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cecelia D. Walton appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment
discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walton v. N.C. Dep’t
of Commerce, No. 1:17-cv-00054-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2018). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.