King Grant-Davis v. South Carolina Office of the Governor

18-1443Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2018

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1443
KING GRANT-DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR; SOUTH CAROLINA
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-02521-PMD)
Submitted: September 20, 2018 Decided: October 2, 2018
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON
PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order denying leave to amend his
amended complaint and adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting
summary judgment to Defendants in Grant-Davis’ civil action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Grant-Davis v. S.C. Office of the Governor, No. 2:15-cv-02521-PMD
(D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.