The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1543•Jane Carter v. Fidelity Life Association
18-1543Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1543
JANE CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FIDELITY LIFE ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00412-D)
Submitted: October 10, 2018 Decided: October 17, 2018
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenn A. Barfield, HAITHCOCK, BARFIELD, HULSE & KINSEY, PLLC, Goldsboro,
North Carolina, for Appellant. Kate L. Villanueva, Isabelle Kountz, DRINKER BIDDLE
& REATH LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jane Carter appeals the district court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) in favor of the Appellee on Carter’s complaint for
breach of accidental death insurance contracts. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Carter v. Fidelity Life Ass’n, No. 5:17-cv-00412-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.