The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1559•Hesman Tall; Doreen Shing v. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
18-1559Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1559
HESMAN TALL; DOREEN SHING,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02120-GJH)
Submitted: October 9, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hesman Tall, Doreen Shing, Appellants Pro Se. Robert David McCray, Assistant
Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hesman Tall and Doreen Shing appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Tall v. MD Dep’t of Health and Mental Hygiene, No. 8:17-cv-02120-GJH (D. Md.
May 2, 2018). We deny Appellants’ motions to stay and for remand. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.