Miguel Alejandrez Tlaxcala v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General

18-1603Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 12, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1603
MIGUEL ALEJANDREZ TLAXCALA,
Petitioner,
v.
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: January 24, 2019 Decided: February 12, 2019
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark J. Devine, Charleston, South Carolina, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant
Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Lindsay C. Corliss, Trial Attorney,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Miguel Alejandrez Tlaxcala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the
decision of the immigration judge (“IJ”) granting the Attorney General’s motion to
recalendar Tlaxcala’s case and denying Tlaxcala’s motion for a continuance. We deny the
petition for review.
We have reviewed the record and Tlaxcala’s arguments and conclude that the IJ did
not abuse his discretion by recalendaring the case and denying the motion for a
continuance. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.