The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1714•Cedrick Euron Draper v. United States Postal Service
18-1714Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1714
CEDRICK EURON DRAPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 18-1715
CEDRICK EURON DRAPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Charlottesville. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00009-GEC; 3:18-cv-00010-
GEC)
Submitted: October 9, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cedrick Euron Draper, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Cedrick Euron Draper appeals the district court’s orders dismissing these actions
without prejudice for failure to serve process on the Defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Draper v. U.S. Postal Serv., Nos. 3:18-cv-00009-GEC; 3:18-cv-00010-GEC (W.D. Va.
May 31, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.