The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1821•Victor Bernard Perkins v. John Ashcroft; Eric H. Holder, Jr.; Loretta Lynch
18-1821Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1821
VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN ASHCROFT; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; LORETTA LYNCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:18-ct-03014-D)
Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing
his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Perkins v. Ashcroft, No. 5:18-
ct-03014-D (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.