The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1859•In re: Billy Raheem Fortune
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1859
In re: BILLY RAHEEM FORTUNE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:13-cv-00687-AWA-TEM)
Submitted: November 1, 2018 Decided: November 13, 2018
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Raheem Fortune, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Billy Raheem Fortune petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court
has unduly delayed acting on his motion for appointment of counsel and his Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b)(2) motion, which we previously remanded for further review. He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that, on August 7, 2018, the court dismissed both motions. Accordingly, because
the district court has recently decided Fortune’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition
as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.