Starsha Sewell v. John Howard

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1999
STARSHA SEWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN HOWARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:18-cv-00095-GJH)
No. 18-2223
In re: STARSHA SEWELL,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00114)
Submitted: December 15, 2018 Decided: December 19, 2018
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In No. 18-1999, Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her
civil complaint and denying her motion for reconsideration. In No. 18-2223, Sewell
appeals the district court’s order modifying a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the
records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sewell v. Howard, No. 8:18-cv-00095-GJH (D. Md. Feb. 7 & Aug. 15,
2018); In re Sewell, No. 1:18-mc-00114 (D. Md. Oct. 4, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --