Spencer Streno v. Shenandoah University

18-2039Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 5, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2039
SPENCER STRENO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00068-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 5, 2019
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Owens, AGEE OWENS, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Katherine
C. Ondeck, Brian Adam Scotti, GORDON & REES, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Spencer Streno appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion to amend the judgment in his underlying civil suit. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Streno v. Shenandoah Univ., No. 5:16-cv-00068-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 6,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.