Frederick J. Andrews v. Virginia Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement, (dcse)

18-2069Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2069
FREDERICK J. ANDREWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD
SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, (DCSE); HENRICO COUNTY; APRIL
FONTAINE; VERNA B. CHRISTOPHER; WANDA ANN HILL; WANDA
ANNE LEE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00301-REP)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick J. Andrews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick J. Andrews appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.* Andrews v. Va. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 3:18-cv-00301-REP (E.D.
Va. Aug. 16, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* To the extent that Andrews argues that the relevant Virginia child support statute
is unconstitutional, absent exceptional circumstances we will not consider arguments
presented for the first time on appeal. Campbell v. Bos. Sci. Corp., 882 F.3d 70, 80 (4th
Cir. 2018). We find that no such circumstances are present and, therefore, decline to
consider Andrews’ claim.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.