The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2137•Jimmy Stewart, Jr. v. Gestamp South Carolina LLC
18-2137Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2137
JIMMY STEWART, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GESTAMP SOUTH CAROLINA LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:17-cv-01023-TMC)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 25, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John J. Coleman, III, Richard Carlton Keller,
BURR & FORMAN LLP, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion for
judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) filed in his employment
discrimination proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in
the reasoning and decision of the text order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Stewart v. Gestamp South Carolina, LLC, No. 7:17-cv-01023-TMC (D.S.C. Aug.
27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.