The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2174•In re: Henry Earl Miller, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan
18-2174Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 19, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2174
In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3; 6:17-cv-00805-JMC)
Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 19, 2018
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that the district court denied relief on Miller’s motion on June 12, 2018.
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Miller’s case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot and deny Miller’s motion to answer a jurisdictional question.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.