In re: Dmitry Pronin

18-2250Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 18, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2250
In re: DMITRY PRONIN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:12-cv-03416-DCN)
Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 18, 2019
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dmitry Pronin, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dmitry Pronin petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has
unduly delayed in scheduling a trial in his suit. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay
in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.