The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2252•In re: Jeffrey A. Pleasant, a/k/a Jeffrey A. Pleasants
18-2252Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 8, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2252
In re: JEFFREY A. PLEASANT, a/k/a Jeffrey A. Pleasants,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:00-cr-00071-REP-RCY-1)
Submitted: February 5, 2019 Decided: February 8, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey A. Pleasant petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that the district court entered its final order denying Pleasant’s § 2255 motion on
January 2, 2019. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Pleasant’s
case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.