The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2322•In re: Henry Earl Miller, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan
18-2322Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2322
In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3; 6:17-cv-00805-JMC)
Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018
Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order
denying relief on Miller’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue
delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
deny the mandamus petition. We also deny Miller’s motion to answer a jurisdictional
question. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.