The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2350•Pamela Snowden v. Nancy A. Berryhill
18-2350Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 20, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2350
PAMELA SNOWDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cv-01849-JKB)
Submitted: February 8, 2019 Decided: February 20, 2019
Before AGEE, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela Snowden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Pamela Snowden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. See Snowden v. Berryhill, No. 1:18-cv-01849-JKB
(D. Md. filed Oct. 26, 2018 & entered Oct. 29, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.