The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2412•Jennifer Suzanne Dawson v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
18-2412Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 15, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2412
JENNIFER SUZANNE DAWSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DELTA AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00240-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: July 31, 2019 Decided: August 15, 2019
Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jennifer Suzanne Dawson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jennifer Suzanne Dawson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s
motion to dismiss and dismissing Dawson’s amended civil complaint. “We review a
district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss de novo,” accepting as true all well-pleaded
facts and construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Lucero v. Early, 873
F.3d 466, 469 (4th Cir. 2017). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dawson v. Delta
Airlines, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-00240-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.