The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2520•William Lee Grant, Ii v. U.s. Department of the Treasury
18-2520Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2520
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01706-PX)
Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 28, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Grant v. U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, No. 1:18-cv-01706-PX (D. Md. Dec. 7, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.