The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6213•Kelvin A. Canada v. Lieutenant Rountree
18-6213Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6213
KELVIN A. CANADA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT ROUNTREE; WILLIAM C. LANE, Lieutenant; CAPTAIN
WHITEHEAD; J. MAYO, Officer; OFFICER GOODRICH; OFFICER BAINES;
OFFICER ASKEW; OFFICER ADAMS; M. WOODRUFF, Nurse; L. O’NEAL,
Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00013-HCM-DEM)
Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: November 8, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin A. Canada, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin A. Canada appeals the district court’s judgment following a bench trial
finding in favor of defendants and denying relief on Canada’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and Canada’s claims and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Canada v. Lt.
Rountree, No. 2:13-cv-00013-HCM-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.