The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6358•George Carter v. J. Patricia Wilson Smoot
18-6358Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 9, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6358
GEORGE CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT; BRICK TRIPP; MELISSA WEST; PATRICIA
HALLEY; G. SECTON; S.A. ASKEW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03024-BO)
Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 9, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George E. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George E. Carter appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2012) his civil rights complaint, which the court construed as filed pursuant
to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Smoot, No. 5:17-ct-
03024-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.