The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6449•James Gregory Armistead v. Jennie Bowen; Timothy Ware; Roger Shackleford; Mose Dorsey; Seth Edwards
18-6449Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 31, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6449
JAMES GREGORY ARMISTEAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JENNIE BOWEN; TIMOTHY WARE; ROGER SHACKLEFORD; MOSE
DORSEY; SETH EDWARDS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03281-BO)
Submitted: August 10, 2018 Decided: August 31, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James G. Armistead, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Gregory Armistead appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Armistead v. Bowen, No. 5:17-ct-03281-BO (E.D.N.C.
Apr. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.