The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6483•Terrance Griffin v. Correctional Officer Cellman
18-6483Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 22, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6483
TERRANCE GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CELLMAN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
EDGARTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BORDEM; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER BLAKELY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:17-cv-00152-MGL)
Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrance Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK, SANDERS &
SIMMONS, LCC, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terrance Griffin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. Cellman, No. 0:17-cv-00152-MGL (D.S.C.
March 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.