The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6494•Douglas A. Hoglan v. A. David Robinson; Ratliffe-Walker; Birckhead; C. Eacho
18-6494Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6494
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
A. DAVID ROBINSON; RATLIFFE-WALKER; BIRCKHEAD; C. EACHO,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MELISSA WELCH, Chair for the VDOC’S Publication Review Committee,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00694-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: October 1, 2018 Decided: October 5, 2018
Before DUNCAN, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas A. Hoglan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas A. Hoglan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
for the Appellees on Hoglan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hoglan v. Robinson, No. 7:15-cv-00694-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 30,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.