The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6499•Robert E. Tippens, Jr. v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.
18-6499Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6499
ROBERT E. TIPPENS, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00784-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 17, 2018
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tippens v. Clarke, No. 3:17-cv-00784-
HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.