The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6576•Sundari K. Prasad v. FOXMORE PROCESS SERVERS; MICHAEL FOXMORE, Owner of Foxmore Servers
18-6576Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6576
SUNDARI K. PRASAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FOXMORE PROCESS SERVERS; MICHAEL FOXMORE, Owner of Foxmore
Servers,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers, No. 3:17-cv-
00041-MHL-RCY (E.D. Va. May 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.