The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6579•United States of America v. David L. Huggard
18-6579Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 18, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6579
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID L. HUGGARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00005-JPJ-1)
Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 18, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Huggard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David L. Huggard appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion to
strike or modify conditions of his supervised release and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Huggard, No. 1:13-
cr-00005-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2018 & May 10, 2018) We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.