Chad Austin v. Warden Timothy Stewart

18-6590Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 13, 2018

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6590
CHAD AUSTIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TIMOTHY STEWART,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02581-PWG)
Submitted: October 29, 2018 Decided: November 13, 2018
Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chad Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Vickie Elaine LeDuc, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Chad Austin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Stewart, No. 8:17-cv-02581-
PWG (D. Md. May 10, 2018). We deny Austin’s motion for appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.