The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6672•United States of America v. Jerome Frederick Satterfield
18-6672Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6672
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEROME FREDERICK SATTERFIELD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:99-cr-00131-TDS-1)
Submitted: October 26, 2018 Decided: November 15, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Frederick Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Frederick Satterfield appeals from the district court’s order granting his
motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), but denying
his request to have his federal sentence run concurrently to his state sentence. We have
reviewed the court’s order de novo and find no error. United States v. Peters, 843 F.3d
572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2267 (2017) (stating standard of
review). We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.