The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6691•George Cleveland, Iii v. State of South Carolina
18-6691Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 4, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6691
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02922-RBH)
Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4, 2018
Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter
or amend a prior order dismissing Cleveland’s notice of removal of his state court
proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. Cleveland v. South Carolina, No. 8:17-cv-02922-RBH (D.S.C. May 7,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.