The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6791•Shannon Lancaster, a/k/a Shannon Miles Lancaster v. James Ruane, 0890
18-6791Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 26, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6791
SHANNON LANCASTER, a/k/a Shannon Miles Lancaster,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES RUANE, 0890,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:17-cv-02302-TMC)
Submitted: October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shannon Miles Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES &
BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shannon Miles Lancaster appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lancaster v. Ruane,
No. 7:17-cv-02302-TMC (D.S.C. June 18, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.