The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6804•James L. Roudabush, Jr. v. B. MOSLEY, Warden
18-6804Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 28, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6804
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
B. MOSLEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (8:18-cv-01378-BHH)
Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court’s June 20, 2018, order
dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) for failure to
comply with its prior order directing that he file his action on a standard form and either
pay the filing fee or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Having determined
that the June 20 order is appealable, see Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,
807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015), we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Mosley, No. 8:18-cv-
01378-BHH (D.S.C. June 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.