The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6862•Prince Nicholas Jervis v. Captain Desaline Perry
18-6862Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6862
PRINCE NICHOLAS JERVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN DESALINE PERRY,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
LIEUTENANT L. RICHARDSON, Shift LT; C. HARPER, Sgt., Shift Assistant
Supervisor; J. BROUSSARD, Cpl., Field Training Officer; A. ASKEW,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00425-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: January 29, 2019 Decided: February 14, 2019
Before FLOYD and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Prince Nicholas Jervis, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Walker Terry, MCCANDLISH
HOLTON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Prince Nicholas Jervis appeals the district court’s order granting Desaline Perry’s
motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Jervis v. Perry, No. 1:17-cv-00425-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. July
2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.